Terence Waterhouse
2018-09-06 14:11:22 UTC
Dear sir,
Â
Although I have been using exclusively Linux for many many years it is only a few days ago I decided to buils my own system using LFS v.8.2. I am not quite certain which list this post should actually be on, but I subscribed to this list because I shall probably need it later... I do not generally post unnecessary questions, and indeed, I don't post questions at all. So here goes :
Â
Building LFS 8.2 went smoothly until section 5.18 bzip2-1.0.6. When I tried to untar the package I got the following output:
Â
tar: This does not look like a tar archive gzip:
stdin: not in gzip format
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
Â
In fact it is apparently a html file according to 'file' output with a tar.gz extension. I first downloaded the original packages with the wget-list file, then, meeting this problem, ran wget with the specific file name. No succes. I tried the site http//:www.bzip.org and could find no trace of the sources. A visit to the site will tell you why.
Â
I tried all the usual tricks to unpack it with absolutely no succes. To cut things short I spent 2 days searching the web to no avail then sent off a desperate search for "what happened to bzip2?" This search produced the following link :
Â
https://lwn.net/Articles/762264/
Â
I also found on this page the following link to the source files of bzip2 and it is the only link I have been able to find:
Â
https://web.archive.org/web/20140722223512/http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz
Â
Download
replace the package obtained from wget-list
untar
and carry on as usual.
Â
I might attract your attention to the fact that the post at lwn.net is dated August 9th 2018 and so is recent.
Â
As LFS uses bzip2 extensively it seemed to me that this information might be of some use. I can only hope that the newly downloaded version works. . .
Â
Many many thanks for the great work, I will let you know if I run into any difficulties with the package.
I leave it to your judgement as to how to address this potentially important issue.
Â
Yours sincerely
Â
Terence Waterhouse
Â
Â
Â
Although I have been using exclusively Linux for many many years it is only a few days ago I decided to buils my own system using LFS v.8.2. I am not quite certain which list this post should actually be on, but I subscribed to this list because I shall probably need it later... I do not generally post unnecessary questions, and indeed, I don't post questions at all. So here goes :
Â
Building LFS 8.2 went smoothly until section 5.18 bzip2-1.0.6. When I tried to untar the package I got the following output:
Â
tar: This does not look like a tar archive gzip:
stdin: not in gzip format
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
Â
In fact it is apparently a html file according to 'file' output with a tar.gz extension. I first downloaded the original packages with the wget-list file, then, meeting this problem, ran wget with the specific file name. No succes. I tried the site http//:www.bzip.org and could find no trace of the sources. A visit to the site will tell you why.
Â
I tried all the usual tricks to unpack it with absolutely no succes. To cut things short I spent 2 days searching the web to no avail then sent off a desperate search for "what happened to bzip2?" This search produced the following link :
Â
https://lwn.net/Articles/762264/
Â
I also found on this page the following link to the source files of bzip2 and it is the only link I have been able to find:
Â
https://web.archive.org/web/20140722223512/http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz
Â
Download
replace the package obtained from wget-list
untar
and carry on as usual.
Â
I might attract your attention to the fact that the post at lwn.net is dated August 9th 2018 and so is recent.
Â
As LFS uses bzip2 extensively it seemed to me that this information might be of some use. I can only hope that the newly downloaded version works. . .
Â
Many many thanks for the great work, I will let you know if I run into any difficulties with the package.
I leave it to your judgement as to how to address this potentially important issue.
Â
Yours sincerely
Â
Terence Waterhouse
Â
Â